“Who approved that post?”
It went live with a wrong number in the headline. Nobody remembers signing it off.
ConvOps runs your content pipeline as governed AI agent workflows. Briefs become drafts. Drafts face two reviews at once. Only a double green ships. Put it on a schedule and it runs every morning, remembering what yesterday taught it.
claude cowork · two reviews side by side · runs on a schedule
new chat
Post: onboarding checklists
AI drafts in seconds. Then the voice, the facts and the review depend on who was in the chat.
“Who approved that post?”
It went live with a wrong number in the headline. Nobody remembers signing it off.
“Where did that decision go?”
The team agreed on no jargon in March. Every new chat writes jargon again.
“What happens when someone leaves?”
Your editor knew the voice. Now the AI and the new hire are guessing.
A real post, run through the Blog Post workflow from Claude Cowork. Then put on a schedule.
You ask for next week's post in plain words. ConvOps creates the task and attaches the Blog Post workflow, with its reviews and its approval.
Before drafting, the AI asks the brain: the reader, the voice rules, the rulings from past reviews. Run 40 writes with what run 1 had to be told.
askblog post voice and audience
Sources are gathered and pinned before the draft starts. Every claim in the draft points back to one of them.
Onboarding checklists people actually finish
SEO and engagement review the draft side by side. A finding sends it back to the draft until both are green. A hard red files a bug instead of shipping.
Keep the approval gate and the pipeline drafts on its own but ships only when you say so. Remove it when the double green is enough.
Publish "Onboarding checklists people finish"?
SEO green · engagement green · 3 sources
Put the workflow on a schedule. Each morning a new task fires with the whole process attached. You stop starting it and keep governing it at the gate.
From brief to published in six steps. Reviews run side by side, and you keep the last word.
Topic, reader and angle, captured as structure, not a doc.
Voice rules and past rulings come back before a word is written.
Sources gathered first. The draft cites them.
SEO and engagement side by side. Findings send it back.
decisionKeep this gate and nothing publishes without you.
needs a personShips with its sources attached.
Every review makes the next draft better. Kept by the team, not by one editor.
Readers are ops leads. No jargon. Plain verbs. Recalled before every draft.
how we sound
Headlines under 60 characters. Decided once in review, applied to every draft after.
decided once
The research folder and the brand guide, so no draft starts with a search.
where it lives
Every ruling points back to the post that produced it.
traceable
The review step tells your AI session to start both reviewers at once. ConvOps holds the step; your session runs the two agents on the same draft.
Findings send the run into a fix sub-workflow that returns to the draft step. It repeats until the reviews pass.
An RRULE schedule either creates a fresh task on each fire, or resumes the same task where its workflow stopped.
Policies like "every claim carries a source" arrive with the step the agent is on. Guidance at the moment it acts.
Connect the AI tool your team already uses, install the workflows, and run one real piece of work through them.
Install the Content Studio pack: blog post, social post, newsletter, repurpose
Run one article attended: brief, research, draft, two reviews in parallel
Watch the fix loop send findings back to the draft until both reviews pass
Then add the schedule, and stop starting it yourself
ConvOps is the operations layer for AI agents: an MCP server that holds your team's process as workflows, with approval gates, a shared memory and an audit trail. It runs no AI models.
The schedule only starts it. The loop then recalls what past runs learned, drafts, faces its reviews, and stops at the gates you placed. Selection, memory, verification, and governance are what make it a system rather than a timer.
The verification gate. Reviews run in parallel and findings loop the draft back until it passes; on a hard red the workflow files a bug task instead of shipping. A loop that cannot fake green is the entire point.
Two places, deliberately: policies deliver rules like "every claim carries a source" into the active step, and memories carry the accumulated rulings, so run 40 writes with everything run 1 had to be told.
Wherever you want one. Keep the approval gate before publish and the pipeline drafts autonomously but ships only when you release it; remove it and the double-green reviews are the bar.